We run your X account: plan, posts and replies. Nothing your counsel would strike.
Same partnership, same facts, same week. One version is a press release with a link in it. The other is how CT actually learns what you built.
Nothing in the thread is a claim the press release didn’t make. That’s the point: your counsel reviews the facts once, we handle the form.
No yield promises, no token price calls, no hinted guarantees. Every post is read for voice, facts and compliance, and none goes live until you approve it.
We know which one you’re in - and what share of the feed should be education, reporting and the ask.
Your first two months on CT: be found, be understood, be worth following. A third of the plan is education - your product explained the way the feed reads, with product proof and the team’s own voice behind it.
Sources we read every day.
No giveaways. Spaces and AMAs with the credit desk, the auditor, the custodian - the people allocators actually want to hear from. Questions about the waterfall get answered by whoever built it.
Pool updates, attestations, doc changes - posted the day they happen, in plain language, with the diff from last month. Proof of process beats promises, especially for a team that can’t make them.
How tokenised private credit actually works, what custody does and doesn’t change, why an SPV exists - threads that get bookmarked by analysts and forwarded to investment committees. This is the third of the plan that does the translation.
Tokenised volume, allocator count, attestation record, partners - posted in context while they’re news. Facts the team can already publish, framed so the sector notices.
Minimums, KYB, onboarding time - the questions allocators ask in replies, answered in replies, with the doc link that actually works. The conversion post is usually a reply.
Posting is the easy half. An RWA account grows in the replies under the right threads - and knowing which threads those are is most of the job.
Most RWA accounts reply to nobody. The ones that get noticed reply to the right forty people.
The weekly report counts what an RWA team can act on - and names the accounts behind the numbers.
DMs, replies and calls from funds, allocators and analysts - listed by name, not counted as “leads”.
Which of the sector’s accounts saw, quoted or replied to you this week, and through which post.
New followers sorted: allocators, funds, analysts, builders - and the share that’s none of the above.
How many of the week’s defining RWA threads you appeared in, and how early.
Impressions are in the report. They’re just not what we’re judged on.
Seven things the team with the audit and the lawyers needs to hear before handing anyone the account.
Get your free 2-week planWe know this market’s narratives and speak its language - without simplifying your product into cringe.
We know which threads and which accounts an RWA project has to show up under for the right people - allocators, funds, analysts - to notice.
Tokenised private credit becomes a thread that gets read to the end. The facts don’t change; the form does.
Not one word you’ll have to explain to your lawyer or a regulator. Forward-looking numbers never leave the draft.
A two-week content plan, in your hands before anything is published. Edit, decline or approve - nothing goes out on its own.
Credible to institutions, native to crypto Twitter. Same facts, tuned to who’s reading each post.
Upload the docs, the deck and the last quarter of posts; get the two-week plan back. No risk of hiring the wrong person.
We start where the narratives start, and add the next room as we go.
Flat monthly pricing. One account, moderate volume, high stakes - lock it in early.
Every plan starts with a strategist reading your docs, your deck and your last quarter of posts. The two-week plan is built with you, then approved by you.